APPLE WATCH VERSUS THE PEBBLE TIME

TechSmash

The Apple Watch has hit the shelves and the lucky few that pre-ordered are enjoying their smartwatches as we speak. However, many of you may be considering the Apple Watch against some of the other smartwatches on the market. One of the most popular and successful smartwatches thus far has been the Pebble.



The company recently announced the original Pebble’s successor, the Pebble Time. The Pebble Time’s Kickstarter campaign shattered its funding goal within 32 minutes and broke the record for reaching $1 million dollars in funding in the least amount of time. Needless to say, there is a sizeable amount of hype for this upcoming smartwatch. The question remains, how will the Pebble Time compare to Apple’s recently released Apple Watch. We’ve compiled some important details surrounding the two smartwatches below for comparison:

 Apple WatchPebble Time
Screen1.65 inch, Color Amoled
screen with Force Touch
technology
1.25 inch, color e-paper
with LED backlight (Non-touch)
Resolution340 X 272 & 390 X 312 
Battery Life18 Hours
(Breakdown Below)
7 Days
SensorsAmbient Light Sensor
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Heart Rate
Microphone
Accelerometer
Compass
Ambient Light Sensor
Microphone
ConnectivityBluetooth 4.0
Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n 2.4 GHz
Bluetooth 4.0
Weight
(With Band)
2t to 69 grams depending
on the band
42.5 grams
Watch Thickness10 – 10.5 mm9.5 mm
Price$349 – $17,000$199 – $299
Water ResistanceUp to 1MUp to 30M
AppsOver 1,000 have been
submitted for approval at
this time
Over 6,500
Storage8 GB TotalUnknown
ProcessorS1 SoC Processor –
Roughly 1 GHz*
Cortex M4 – 100 MHz
RAMUnknownUnknown – Apps will have
access to 64 KB of RAM
Compatible PhonesiPhonesiPhones with iOS 8.0+ and
Android Phones with 4.0+
Release DateReleased but Current orders
will not be fulfilled until July
May 2015

As is noted in the above table, each device has its strengths. Below are a few noteworthy items that stuck out to use during our assessment of the two smartwatches:

Processor and Screen

The Apple Watch is definitely the powerhouse of the bunch. With a processor that is roughly comparable to the A5 that was in the iPhone 4S, the Apple Watch blows the Pebble Time out of the water from a processor standpoint. Additionally, the Apple Watch is equipped with a much higher resolution screen that supports a significantly greater range of colors. Photos will look comparable to that of your phone screen on the Apple Watch; be-it a smaller display. However with the Pebble Time, photos will be lower resolution and discolored. (Think a little bit better than Game Boy Camera photos on your Gameboy Color)

Such power and screen resolution open a lot of future opportunity for the Apple Watch. App developers will have much more to work with when developing for the Apple Watch, enabling them to do things that will be physically impossible on the Pebble Time. It will be interesting to see how relevant processor power is in years to come for smartwatches. Currently, smartwatches are best utilized as notification hubs which don’t require a lot of power. Time will tell.

Battery Life

All of the Apple Watch’s power does come at a cost. The estimated battery life for the Apple Watch is 18 hours and that’s being quite conservative from a “use” standpoint. Below is the breakdown of “use” in that 18 hour period:

  • 90 Time Checks
  • 90 Notifications
  • 45 Minutes of App Use
  • 30 Minutes of Playing Music

The Pebble Time uses an e-Color screen which is what allows it to have significantly better battery life; up to 7 days! One of the primary complaints from early Apple Watch reviewers is that battery life is quite poor. If you don’t want another device to charge every day (or multiple times a day), you probably want to go with the Pebble Time. 

Apps

Available apps are another noteworthy mentionable. The Pebble Time will be fully backwards compatible with all Pebble apps providing access to a library of 6,500+ apps. The Apple Watch is coming out of the gate with approximately 1,000+ apps, many of which are yet to be street tested. Apple will surely catch up, but Pebble is currently the front-runner in the apps department. 

Fitness Tracking

From a fitness perspective, the Apple Watch has a heart rate sensor, accelerometer, and GPS that are all used in tandem with the integrated fitness apps. These apps allow you to track your activity, the intensity of the workout, and more. The Pebble Time does have an accelerometer that could be used for tracking movement, but nothing has been announced at this time. The Apple Watch is water-resistant up to 1 Meter meaning you can shower, wash the dishes, or endure a sweaty basketball game. The Pebble Time is water-resistant at up to 30 meters meaning you could go swimming with the device if desired. Each watch has its pros and cons from a fitness perspective, but the Apple Watch is the frontrunner in this category in my opinion. due to the additional sensor and tracking options.

Apple Watch Versus Pebble Time


Overall

Overall, they are both great smart watches with incredible potential. Considering that the Pebble Time was able to raise $20 million dollars in a Kickstarter campaign with a goal of $500,000 dollars is indicative of the demand for the device. The Apple Watch has seen incredible pre-order numbers far outpacing most other competition. At the end of the day, it comes down to preference of one smartwatch’s features over the other. Let us know which you are planning to buy in the comments below. 

APPLE WATCH: DAY-ONE IMPRESSIONS

Apple Watch

The Apple Watch has been out for a little while; just enough time to get some of the kinks worked out. I finally got my hands on one, and I’ve completed a full day of use. (Apple unfortunately did not have sufficient supply to provide us a review unit. So we had to buy one for this review and it took some time to finally get to us.) How does the Apple Watch stack up after a day’s use? Read on to find out my initial impressions. 



The Good

One of Apple’s core values is to create a device that carries an equal amount of swagger to match the functionality of the device. The Apple Watch definitely follows suit. The device is stunning. I’m wearing the sport version with a bright blue band and I still feel like the king of the world. I’ve even received multiple compliments on the watch in a single day. (They were surprisingly able to see past my chiseled abs and giant biceps – Incredible!) It’s definitely a beautiful device even if you’re not buying the expensive Watch Edition. 

The screen is also phenomenal. It’s bright, crisp, and works well in sunlight. There are a number of vivid watch faces to display the time in different manners. I prefer the default modular option as you can customize what you see when you’re checking the time. You can include the temperature outside, stock tickers, your fitness goal progress, battery life, alarm, stopwatch, calendar appointments, and more. One of my favorite features of the watch is the calendar function in the watch face. While simple, anytime I look at the time I can also see what meetings are upcoming or currently in progress. Considering I have anywhere from four to six different meetings each day, this feature is a godsend.

Something that I thought could be a deal-breaker has actually performed surprisingly well: battery life. The media was all over Apple’s battery life when they released their detailed break down of daily use. However, I can report that even after spending the day with intense fiddling, It’s now 10:16 PM and I have 42% battery life. It’s worth noting that due to the low number of apps and the way you interact with apps, you’re not going to be spending inordinate amounts of time looking at the Apple Watch’s screen. 

Finally, the last and probably greatest benefit that I’ve noticed so far is that I don’t miss a notification. A subtle vibration on the wrist is rarely missed versus my phone vibrating in my semi-baggy pants. I typically have to clear out a giant pile of notifications at regular intervals on my phone. With the Apple Watch, I simply glance, act, and clear. Disclaimer: I’m still in the honeymoon phase with the Apple Watch, so each vibration on my wrist gets me a bit excited. Time will tell whether this benefit wears off over time.

The Bad

A number of other reviewers have stated that there is a learning curve associated with the interface of the Apple Watch. I spent some time with one in the Apple Store prior to receiving mine where an Apple employee took me through the various features. So I was a bit ahead of the game when I received my Apple Watch. However even then, I still had to do some Googling to figure a number of things out.

I’m not a huge fan of how reliant the device is on the iPhone. Installing apps requires you to pull out your phone. Changing settings requires you to pull out your phone. Heck, even Siri at times responded with a handoff to my phone. I thought the purpose of the Apple Watch was to enable you to reduce the amount of time you spend on your phone. 

The second and probably biggest disappointment was in the Apple Watch’s app offering. This is likely to change after Apple recently announced native apps at WWDC earlier this year, however, for us early adopters it’s still disappointing. I typically like to dive into my devices when I first buy them and try out all of the different features. However, when I sat down with the Apple Watch last night for the first time, I looked at my notifications, tried turning on my music, using Siri, and checking my heart rate; but at that point I felt like I was done and didn’t know where to go next.

I researched what the best apps for the Apple Watch are and one recommendation was Instapaper. So I installed it. However, all it does is use voice-to-text to read your saved web pages back to you; and it uses your phone’s speaker to do so! Many of the other recommended/available apps don’t really apply to my needs. I’m hopefully that with Apple’s recent announcement we will see a wave of apps that bring incredible value to the Watch. 

My main observation is that the Apple Watch is a portal to timely information when you need it. The dynamic of how and when to use this is completely different from what developers are used to in regards to smart phone apps. I’m confident that with some time, developers will figure it out and the app offering will be the most enticing aspect of the Apple Watch. 



The Ugly

First, there is nothing ugly about the Apple Watch. It’s beautiful. However, I’m a full day in after having done some hardcore fiddling and I’m still not 100% sold on the device. Guaranteed notifications are great and the device itself is downright sexy, but until the watch does more for you than ensure you don’t miss a notification, I’m not sold on it being worth the $350+ dollar investment that it is. 

Many other reviewers have stated that it takes a solid couple of days of use before they really began to understand Apple’s intentions behind the device. I’m confident that I’ll get there, but I’m certainly not there after a single day. However, this is Apple we’re talking about. Their products sell because they focus on what consumers want. While we may not quite be at a utopian state, I’m confident we will get there soon; possibly even during the time that I review this device. Stay tuned for a full review. 

Do you have an Apple Watch? Tell us about your AHA (or lack thereof) moment in the comments below. 

APPLE TO UTILIZE FORCE TOUCH IN THE NEXT IPHONE

Force Touch

It’s summertime, and what better way to enjoy your summer than to hear the latest Apple Rumors? According to Bloomberg, Apple has started production on a new iPhone Model. This new model will incorporate technology known as Force Touch, which is already utilized in Apple’s Apple Watch and the newest MacBook. 

Force Touch is a technology that Apple uses to sense the amount of force that is being applied to the device. Measuring the amount of force gives Apple the ability to present a new range of functionality. For instance, Apple can present different controls and apps depending on how much pressure you use. This new technology is Apple’s “next big thing” (Samsung motto) and hopes it will set them apart from the competition. 



While Force Touch appears to be a great technology that can be utilized in your phone, it is difficult to see how useful it will be. It almost feels like Apple is trying to take a page out of Samsung’s book by creating different “gestures” to perform different tasks.  While the gesture is significantly different (more simple) than what Samsung has done, the result is the same, to create one motion that will accomplish a specific task. However, the Force Touch technology is much easier to use and will probably not fail like most of Samsung’s gestures have.

I don’t claim to be a touch screen expert, but I find it interesting that Apple is pushing Force Touch so hard. Yes, the concept is cool, but it seems that a similar technology is already being utilized. For example, when you are on a document or web page and you hold your finger down on a word, you have the ability copy or define what you have selected. What is stopping Apple, Samsung, Google or any other manufacturer to programming your phone to be able to perform the same functions that Force Touch can do, but utilizing the length of time you are holding your finger on the screen? 



Keep in mind that what we think we know at this time are still rumors, and don’t expect Apple to state they are planning on incorporating Force Touch into their next iPhone until the new phone is officially unveiled. 

What are your thoughts? Do you think Force Touch is the “next big thing”, or do you think Force Touch will just be a gimmick? Let us know what you think in the comment section below.

APPLE TAKES MARKET SHARE CONTROL IN Q4, SORRY SAMSUNG

Apple

For years, Samsung and Apple have been in a never-ending battle of smartphone dominance. Samsung has been the leader when it comes to worldwide smartphone sales since 2011, which put them ahead in the race. It seems this has changed, according to a recent press release by Gartner Inc. 

Gartner has revealed that Samsung has lost the number one spot in global smartphone sales in quarter four of 2014. Samsung lost nearly 10 percentage points in market share in 2014, which could possibly be due to its disappointing release of the Samsung Galaxy S5 and Apple making drastic changes and improvements with its release of the iPhone 6.

Anshul Gupta of Gartner states:

Samsung continues to struggle to control its falling smartphone share, which was at its highest in the third quarter of 2013. This downward trend shows that Samsung’s share of profitable premium smartphone users has come under significant pressure.

With Samsung struggling, Apple recorded its best quarter ever in quarter four of 2014. During this quarter, Apple sold 74.8 million units which pushed them just past Samsung to number one.  Apple’s release of the iPhone 6 Plus is also converting more Samsung users who were put off by past iPhone’s small phone displays. Smart move Apple!

To get a better grasp of the current situation check out the table below:

Apple

Although it appears that Apple just barely took the majority of market share, many expect it to go up if Samsung does not make a big splash with the Samsung Galaxy S6. It is worth noting that while Apple has taken the market share when it comes to  smartphones, when it comes to operating systems Android still dominates the market. You can see how apparent this is in the table below:

Apple

Samsung has officially unveiled the Samsung Galaxy S6, and we can see that they’ve completely redesigned their flagship smartphone. These changes appear to have given Samsung hope, so it will be interesting to see if they can chomp back some lost market share upon its release. 

With that said, do you think Samsung will be able to make up lost ground when the S6 is released? Or will Apple extend their lead? Tell us your thoughts in the comment section below.

APPLE SCRAPS USB TYPE-C IN NEW MACBOOK DESIGN

MacBook

#AprilFools


Apple rarely gives in to backlash from the community. From the original release of their lightning cable to the recently announced Macbook with a single USB Type-C port, the company’s typical M.O. is to drive consumer adoption of new technology by taking away other options. Incredibly, it seems community backlash in this instance has proven too strong, forcing Apple to reconsider their awkward design choice for their flagship laptop. However, the new design may not prove to be any more popular than the original. 

A Quick Refresh

For those who may have been in a coma during the original news announcement, Apple announced their new Macbook computer during their Spring Forward event in early March of this year. The device will be thinner than their current Macbook Air, boast fanless internals, and a breathtaking retina display. However, their choice of available ports led to an incredible amount of notably unhappy individuals, even amongst the Apple community. 

Apple made the decision to design the computer with a single USB Type-C connector as the sole port for the entire computer. This port would be used for everything from charging the computer to connecting your smartphone and other peripherals. With only one port, many were upset that it would require the purchase of a special splitter cable to allow them to both power their laptop AND connect their USB devices. 

To add insult to injury, USB Type-C is not backward compatible with the current USB connector. This would mean that the majority of USB devices on the market would not be able to connect to the computer without a converter cable that Apple will likely charge a premium for. Just go take a look at the comments section in the original article that we posted if you need a point of reference on how people were feeling about the announcement.



A Port-Free New Design

As a result, Apple has decided to take a fully wireless approach and is doing away with ports altogether. Initially reported by USA Today, the redesigned computer will connect devices using the latest iterations of both Bluetooth 4.0 and Wifi 802.11ac technology. Apple is doing away with the antiquated model of connecting devices using cords to bring us to a world free of clutter. In an interview with the The Verge, Tim Cook further elaborates on the company’s vision:

Apple products have always been engineering and design masterpieces. Our goal when designing any product is to create a device that is both powerful and stunning. Cords have long been the most unattractive aspect any of our devices. As a result, we’ve found a way to eliminate them altogether. 

Now, before you give Apple even more backlash for this decision, they have created a dongle that will connect wirelessly to the computer so that you can connect your typically non-wireless USB devices to the computer. However, the dongle will only support USB Type-C and will require a converter cable to connect regular USB devices to the dongle. Additionally, the dongle is battery-powered and will give you 4 hours of total use on a single charge. (See the diaphragm below for details.)

MacBook

A New Form of Power

Probably the most groundbreaking aspect of the design change is the way that the laptop will be powered. Without any ports, this will be the first laptop of its kind that does not plug into a power source of any kind. Apple revealed in their blog post:

There has been much speculation as to why we have been investing in bringing over employees from Tesla and other companies involved in innovating in the battery and power space. Today, we’re excited to finally reveal some details regarding those employee acquisitions. 

We have designed a new type of battery that will change the way you charge your device forever. The battery uses complex circuitry to capitalize on kinetic energy to recharge. As you’re walking to work or driving on a bumpy road, each movement provides a surprising jolt of fuel to your computer as a result of our engineering feat. 

Apple goes on to explain that their redesign choice is not solely motivated by their desire to advance battery technology:

At the center of our core values lies equality, something that our country is sorely struggling with at the moment. Our team of sociologists have identified that a key driver behind discrimination is our countries struggle with obesity. Our kinetically powered laptop will require that you take at least 3,000 steps per day to guarantee a full charge. We hope that our initiative will fight against both obesity and in turn, discrimination. 

The choice to omit the ability to charge the computer from a normal power source is extremely interesting, especially considering the political motivation behind the change. However, for those who want to charge their device without walking, Apple has designed the Charge Pod. This cradle gently shakes your device simulating the movement of a walking human being. These gentle shakes can charge the device in just under 11 hours.



It will be interesting to see how the community responds to Apple’s design changes on their new Macbook. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. 

Oh…this just in… This article is an April Fools joke. 

Disclaimer: Any and all links, quotes, and statements made above are completely and utterly false. Please don’t hurt me.  

APPLE RELEASES TOOL TO DISABLE IMESSAGE

iMessage

Although I do not know many people who have made the switch from Apple%20iPhone 6, Gold, 16 GB (Verizon)Apple to Android or windows smartphones (sorry forgot about you blackberry users). One question I often hear is, “why am I not receiving texts from other Apple%20iPhone 6, Gold, 16 GB (Verizon)iPhone users”? I can answer that in one word, iMessage! Or better known as iMessage Purgatory.

Most iPhone users have been unaware that they have been using iMessage. The service has been turned on by default since its initial release with IOS 5 back in 2011.  It’s not typically until making the switch, however, that it becomes blatantly obvious that you are no longer receiving texts from friends and family members who are currently using an Apple%20iPhone 6, Gold, 16 GB (Verizon)iPhone. 

For years, iPhones users have had to go through the process of disabling their old device from their Apple accounts in order to receive texts from other iPhone users by calling into Apple or visiting their genius bar. This had to be done before deactivating the device to unassociate the current phone number. This became a big pain point for many customers and was highly vocalized earlier this year.

In response, Apple quietly released a new tool to make the switch to other smartphones a little bit easier. The process can be completed by following these simple steps.

If you have your iPhone and have not yet deactivate the phone:

iMessage

          Go to Settings

iMessage

          Select messages

iMessage

          Turn iMessage off

If you no longer have your iPhone:

  1. Go to the Deregister site here
  2.  Type in your phone number and confirmation code.
  3. Click Submit

Although this should have been avoided by proper planning in the first place, it is nice that Apple has created a simple tool (after many lawsuits) to allow past users to disable iMessage. 

Do you think this is a good move by Apple%20iPhone 6, Gold, 16 GB (Verizon)Apple? Or are they far to late to the party? Tell us in the comment section below!

APPLE RELEASES APPLE WATCH BAND DESIGN GUIDELINES

Apple Watch

Not surprisingly, there are number of people still waiting to receive their Apple Watch. For the last few weeks, Apple has been shipping watch after watch trying to fulfill the huge amount of Apple Watch orders, but continue to fall behind. While people continue to wait, third party manufactures are hard at work as well, designing and building accessories for the coveted Apple Watch–now that Apple has released its design specifications on their developer resource page.



Today, Apple posted a PDF document which outlines the design of the Apple Watch, its specifications, and the do’s and don’ts for third party manufactures. These details have opened the doors for endless Apple Watch accessories. One may think anyone can get the design specifications and build away, however that’s not the case. Apple is determined to have third party manufactures  build only quality accessories for their smartwatch. So no cheap Amazon finds for us penny-pinchers (though I am sure you will be able to find some). Apple indicates that manufactures must “comply with applicable environmental regulations in the regions in which such bands are to be sold”. If you want to know what that means, you can check out the PDF that is provided, but take precaution that it might be a little hard to understand.

In addition to the environmental regulations, builders have a number of other guidelines they need to follow. For example, the band must not prevent the Apple Watch from touching users’ skin. This ensures that the heart rate monitor functions correctly. While some of the guidelines may seem strict, Apple has these guidelines in place to ensure manufactures create products that live up to the pristine Apple Watch.

reversesrap

This may be surprising news for some, as many were under the impression that Apple was not going to allow third party manufactures to create accessories for the Apple Watch. Now users will be able to choose from a large variety of bands that fit their style. We are starting to see rumors surface of bands that could provide an additional charge to the Apple Watch to improve its battery life. According to  reservestrap.com:

We’ve developed and tested a completely rethought design that takes advantage of the 6 pin port underneath the band slide of the Apple Watch. This port hadn’t been deciphered by anyone until now but we’ve been able to make significant enough observations so far to warrant shifting our development focus to this new method. We’re looking forward to sharing more design details and technical specification of this new Reserve Strap as soon as we can.



I am sure this Reserve Strap is not the only band we will see that can charge the Apple Watch; lets just hope the other manufactures don’t price their band at $249.99. Regardless, more choice for the consumer is always a better situation. Thank you Apple for opening up such possibilities. (For once…)

Do you think Apple made a good decision by allowing third party manufactures to create accessories for the Apple Watch? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below

APPLE RECALLS THOUSANDS OF BEATS XL SPEAKERS DUE TO FIRE HAZARD

Beats XL

Have a Beats Pill XL Speaker? Your house may be about to burst into flames. Okay, that might be a bit dramatic, but your house burning down is not out of the question. Apple is recalling all Beats XL Speakers sold between January of last year to present time due to a fire hazard. More than 233,000 speakers will be recalled across the United States and Canada.



Apple revealed the following in a press release:

Apple has determined that, in rare cases, the battery in the Beats Pill XL may overheat and pose a fire safety risk.

In case you’re unsure what a Beats Pill XL Speaker looks like, “the Beats Pill XL can be identified by the Beats “b” logo on the speaker grille and the words “beats pill XL” on the handle. The product is sold in five colors: black, metallic sky, pink, titanium and white.” You can also reference the image at the top of this article.

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, there have been 8 reports of the speaker overheating: one that caused burn damage to a user’s desk and another that burned the user’s finger. (It’s also possible that the speakers voluntarily burst into flames after playing too much Kanye West, however, this was not mentioned in the CPSC’s announcement. Sarcasm.) The instructions on the matter are clear, if you have one of these speakers, you need to stop using it immediately and return it to Apple for a credit. Apple will provide the postage paid box necessary to return the devices to their facilities.

Beats XL

Screen capture of Apple Store

Apple will give you the option of receiving either an Apple Store credit or a $325 electronic payment. Considering that Apple currently shows out of stock on the Beats Pill XL speaker (likely due to the recall), if you’re going with the Apple Store you don’t have a lot of comparable options outside of either the reduced size Beats Pill speaker or the Bose SoundLink speaker. If you opt for the electronic payment option, there is always Amazon and their myriad of available bluetooth wireless speakers. One of the most highly rated wireless bluetooth speakers in the same price range is the Infinity One Premium Wireless Portable Speaker; definitely a contender to consider if you find yourself stuck between this rock and a hard place.



Regardless, if you own a Beats XL Speaker, you’re going to want to march on over to this link to begin the process of getting your refund. What speaker are you going to buy to replace your Beats XL? Let us know in the comments below.